Aurizon - stop Adani! - Market Forces

[cs_content][cs_element_section _id=”1″ ][cs_element_row _id=”2″ ][cs_element_column _id=”3″ ][x_custom_headline level=”h2″ looks_like=”h3″ accent=”false”]Aurizon – stop Adani![/x_custom_headline][cs_element_text _id=”5″ ][/cs_element_column][cs_element_column _id=”6″ ][cs_element_content_area _id=”7″ ][/cs_element_column][/cs_element_row][/cs_element_section][cs_element_section _id=”8″ ][cs_element_row _id=”9″ ][cs_element_column _id=”10″ ][x_accordion][x_accordion_item title=”TAKE ACTION: tell Aurizon to stop Adani!” open=”true” class=”accordionSunsetPurple”]

Name*
First Last
Email Address*
Location*
Country
Postcode (Australia)*
Postcode (non-Australian)*
I am an Aurizon shareholder
- Yes
Subject (for the email to Aurizon)*
Your message (you can personalise and amend this, your name will be automatically added at the end)*
I am writing to insist Aurizon: 1. denies Adani any support for the proposed rail line connecting the Carmichael coal mine with the Queensland rail network beyond what is legally necessary, and 2. announces publicly that it refuses to do the coal haulage for Adani, like Genesee and Wyoming has recently done. Aurizon is well aware of the environmental, social, economic and reputational risks associated with Adani’s proposed Carmichael coal mine. You have studied this project carefully when attempting to work directly with Adani and other Galilee Basin coal mine proponents. You already know it would be the largest proposed coal mine in Australia. You are familiar with the operating habits of Adani. You have felt community pressure when proposing your own rail solution to open up the Galilee Basin and understand the reputational risk that comes from assisting Adani to build the Carmichael project in any way, shape or form. Surely Aurizon understands this is not a project or company you should allow anywhere near your own operations. I also note Aurizon has begun to publish reports on sustainability and last year gave your support for the Paris Climate Agreement. As the modelling from your own sustainability report shows, meeting the Paris Agreement will place pressure on Australian coal exports and your existing clients. Adding the tens of millions of tonnes per year from Adani’s Carmichael mine is not sustainable for many of your existing clients. Moreover, we are well past the point where the coal industry could be expanded and considered consistent with meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement. I appreciate how Aurizon is grappling with the significant structural challenges this poses but the company is hardly served by increasing stranded asset risk across its client base by allowing Adani. Please respond as soon as possible to confirm: 1. Aurizon will not assist Adani to develop its proposed rail connection to haul Carmichael coal to Abbot Point or provide coal haulage services for this coal, and 2. Aurizon will not allow Adani access to the existing Queensland rail network beyond what is required by legislation. Thank you,
Your message (you can personalise and amend this, your name will be automatically added at the end)*
As a shareholder, I am writing to insist Aurizon: 1. denies Adani any support for the proposed rail line connecting the Carmichael coal mine with the Queensland rail network beyond what is legally necessary, and 2. announces publicly that it refuses to do the coal haulage for Adani, like Genesee and Wyoming has recently done. Aurizon is well aware of the environmental, social, economic and reputational risks associated with Adani’s proposed Carmichael coal mine. You have studied this project carefully when attempting to work directly with Adani and other Galilee Basin coal mine proponents. You already know it would be the largest proposed coal mine in Australia. You are familiar with the operating habits of Adani. You have felt community pressure when proposing your own rail solution to open up the Galilee Basin and understand the reputational risk that comes from assisting Adani to build the Carmichael project in any way, shape or form. Surely Aurizon understands this is not a project or company you should allow anywhere near your own operations. I also note Aurizon has begun to publish reports on sustainability and last year gave your support for the Paris Climate Agreement. As the modelling from your own sustainability report shows, meeting the Paris Agreement will place pressure on Australian coal exports and your existing clients. Adding the tens of millions of tonnes per year from Adani’s Carmichael mine is not sustainable for many of your existing clients. Moreover, we are well past the point where the coal industry could be expanded and considered consistent with meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement. I appreciate how Aurizon is grappling with the significant structural challenges this poses but the company is hardly served by increasing stranded asset risk across its client base by allowing Adani. Please respond as soon as possible to confirm: 1. Aurizon will not assist Adani to develop its proposed rail connection to haul Carmichael coal to Abbot Point, or provide coal haulage servcies for this coal and 2. Aurizon will not allow Adani access to the existing Queensland rail network beyond what is required by legislation. Thank you,
Of course I want to get updates about this campaign from Market Forces!
- Yes

[/x_accordion_item][/x_accordion][/cs_element_column][/cs_element_row][/cs_element_section][/cs_content]

Aurizon – stop Adani!

Join the campaign!

Join our mailing list

Take Action

Put your bank on notice

Sign the petition

Meet the Team

Take Action

Sign our open letter to the big banks

Put your bank on notice